Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see who cited a particular article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see what papers cited a particular article, click on “[Who Cited This?] which can be found at the end of every article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Peters, R. (1988). Monick, Eugene. Phallos: Sacred Image of the Masculine. Toronto. Inner City books, 1987. Pp. 141. $13.. J. Anal. Psychol., 33(2):199-200.

(1988). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 33(2):199-200

Monick, Eugene. Phallos: Sacred Image of the Masculine. Toronto. Inner City books, 1987. Pp. 141. $13.

Review by:
Roderick Peters

Before I had finished the Introduction I felt I was reading an important book, a substantial and valuable contribution. Although some chapters are a bit patchy, by the time I had turned the last page of Monick's book my sense of its importance had not been lessened. There were moments when I felt I had not been presented with such important new material—to which my soul responded with the delight of ‘rightness’—since first reading some parts of Jung and Neumann. I recognise that this high valuation may well be because I am a man: even within that limitation I may be responding for nearly half the human race.

In addition to this, it is well written by an author who comes across as an intelligent and unpretentious man, formerly an Episcopalian priest and now a Jungian analyst in Scranton, Pennsylvania and New York.

It is all really rather simple—and I say this not in disparagement, but in admiration: things seem simple and obvious once they are ready to be known. But someone has to be the one to say it, and that is what Monick has done.

His essential statement is that the patriarchal values are under assault and crumbling; that too many men have identified masculinity too much with patriarchy; that there is a need, mainly perhaps in men but also in women, to distinguish the masculine from the patriarchal and to integrate awareness of it (i.e., the masculine) and its chthonic divinity.

This he does by examining ‘phallos’ as the masculine godhead and emblem.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.