Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Shin, Y. Lee, J. Han, O. Rhi, B. (2005). The influence of complexes on implicit learning. J. Anal. Psychol., 50(2):175-190.

(2005). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50(2):175-190

The influence of complexes on implicit learning Related Papers

Yong-Wook Shin, M.D., Joong-Sun Lee, M.D., Oh-Su Han, M.D., Ph.D. and Bou-Yong Rhi, M.D., Ph.D.

A century ago, Jung looked into the unconscious through complexes by using word association tests. Jung wrote, ‘modern psychology with its investigation of complexes has opened up a psychic taboo area riddled with hopes and fears’, and complexes remain an unexplored taboo area of research. In the present study, we have investigated the influence of complexes on unconscious cognitive processing, in particular on implicit learning. We have found that complexes shown to disturb conscious cognitive processing in fact enhanced the attention of the subjects and their performance on an implicit learning task. These results suggest that complexes are not just abstractions, but have various actual influences on both conscious and unconscious processing.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.