Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).
Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.
Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Austin, S. (2005). Mogenson, Greg. Northern Gnosis: Thor, Baldr and the Volsungs in the Thought of Freud and Jung. New Orleans, La.: Spring Journal Books, 2005. Pp. 140. Pbk. $200.00.. J. Anal. Psychol., 50(5):711-712.
(2005). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 50(5):711-712
Mogenson, Greg. Northern Gnosis: Thor, Baldr and the Volsungs in the Thought of Freud and Jung. New Orleans, La.: Spring Journal Books, 2005. Pp. 140. Pbk. $200.00.
Review by: Sue Austin
In Northern Gnosis Mogenson's aim is that of comparative study—of ‘insighting the theories of Freud and Jung through the lens of Norse myth’ (p. xii). He does not seek to provide a psychological reading of Norse mythology, but aims instead to ‘discover how Norse divinities enact themselves in the concepts and theories of our depth psychological forebears’ (p. xii). His primary point of reference throughout is Jung's characterization of psychology as an archaic myth in modern dress (p. 79).
Northern Gnosis is relevant to clinicians in a number of ways. First, and I suggest, most importantly, it reminds us how the psyche, in spite of all our efforts, refuses to be assimilated into consciousness. Here I am reminded strongly of a comment by Sherry Salman (see ‘Blood Payments’ in Terror, Violence and the Impulse to Destroy, ed. John Beebe, 2003, p. 245), which provides a particularly telling image of the kinds of dynamics which Mogenson is discussing:
Jung early on pointed out that when we deny the autonomy of any complex, much less of archetypal affect, trying to ‘assimilate’ it, eat it, and make it ‘one of our own,’ we are engaging in … a magical solution that is doomed eventually to fail. It is unsettling to observe how easily in our analytic practice and training, what we often find left behind after a therapeutic meal of such ego-satisfying interpretations, are still the Furies.
Northern Gnosis gives us a range of Norse counterparts to the Furies, each determined to live its own telos, its own part, regardless of our attempts to assimilate it.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]