Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).
Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.
Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Rowland, S. (2011). Stein, Murray & Jones, Raya (Eds.). Cultures and Identities in Transition: Jungian Perspectives. Routledge, 2010. Pp. xi + 230. Pbk. £22.99/$36.95.. J. Anal. Psychol., 56(1):134-136.
(2011). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 56(1):134-136
Stein, Murray & Jones, Raya (Eds.). Cultures and Identities in Transition: Jungian Perspectives. Routledge, 2010. Pp. xi + 230. Pbk. £22.99/$36.95.
Review by: Susan Rowland
What are Jungian Studies? One way to answer this question is to turn to this fine new collection of crafted essays, edited by Murray Stein and Raya A. Jones. Stemming from an academic conference of Jungian studies held jointly in Zurich in 2008 by the analysts' organization, the International Association for Analytical Psychology (IAAP), and a Jungian scholars group, the International Association for Jungian Studies (IAJS), this collection proves the fertility of the field.
In particular, these papers are true to depth psychology in its ability to open up profound questions of knowledge, psyche and culture in ways that frame future research. For example, I found one key to my understanding of Jungian studies in Christian Gaillard's provocative and persuasive ‘Jung's art’. Here (p. 108) he insists that:
It is apparent that Jung's relationship to the arts cannot be assigned to either ‘applied psychoanalysis’ or ‘applied psychology’ …
On the contrary, as we shall see, it is largely as a result of his progressive discoveries of the arts, his exploratory rapport with those works of art that he encountered and revisited and, even more radically, his interaction with what we now call ‘creative processes’, that Jung came to open a new route to psychoanalysis and its renovation from the inside out.
Such a revelation transforms the relationship of Jung's work as a ‘psychology’ to other bodies of knowledge. ‘Jungian studies’ here is not about ‘applying’ Jungian concepts as an external unproblematic to culture or the arts.
[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]