Did you write an article’s title and the article did not appear in the search results? Or do you want to find a specific phrase within the article? Go to the Search section and write the title or phrase surrounded by quotations marks in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Winborn, M. (2020). Ogden, Thomas. (2019). ‘Ontological Psychoanalysis or “What do You Want to Be when You Grow up?”’ Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 88, 4, 661-84.. J. Anal. Psychol., 65(4):765-768.
(2020). Journal of Analytical Psychology, 65(4):765-768
Ogden, Thomas. (2019). ‘Ontological Psychoanalysis or “What do You Want to Be when You Grow up?”’ Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 88, 4, 661-84.
Review by: Mark Winborn
Thomas Ogden has been at the forefront of creative, original analytic thought and practice for 40 years. During this period, he has published 11 books on psychoanalysis, 139 articles, numerous books chapters, and two novels. His oeuvre has contributed significantly to the emergence and development of the intersubjective perspective in psychoanalysis - which has moved the field from a one-person (isolated mind) perspective to a two-person interactive field theory and that now widely incorporates Odgen's (1994) concept of the ‘analytic third’ used to describe emergent experiences generated intersubjectively by the unique pairing of the analytic partners. The field of intersubjectivity and the concept of the analytic third can be thought of as similar to the alchemical relationship and the transcendent third described by Jung (1946) in ‘The psychology of the transference’. While Ogden's work is often classified as falling within the school of thought referred to as intersubjectivity, his ‘subjects of analysis’ range widely, including re-examinations of significant psychoanalytic theorists (such as Klein, Winnicott, Bion, and Searles), aesthetics, literature, poetry, language, and dreaming. However, Ogden always centres his focus on experience: the experience of the analyst and patient, the writer and audience, or the mother and infant. In this article, Ogden asks his readers to consider, or re-consider ‘What do you want to be when you grow up?’ By this he means ‘What is your experience of yourself as an analyst, therapist, or analytic candidate? and ‘Are you still in the process of becoming that person?’ Ogden's wish for us, and his implicit challenge to us, is that we will always be in the process of becoming. He also proposes that the question of ‘What do you want to be when you grow up?’ is also the implicit question that most of our analysands carry with them into analysis, even when their consciousmotivation is around symptomatic relief.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2018 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]