Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To sort articles by author…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

While performing a search, you can sort the articles by Author in the Search section. This will rearrange the results of your search alphabetically according to the author’s surname. This feature is useful to quickly locate the work of a specific author.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Carveth, D.L. (2010). Superego, Conscience, and the Nature and Types of Guilt. Mod. Psychoanal., 35(1):106-130.

(2010). Modern Psychoanalysis, 35(1):106-130

Superego, Conscience, and the Nature and Types of Guilt

Donald L. Carveth, Ph.D.

In his contribution to psychoanalysis and social theory, Freud, Women, and Morality: The Psychology of Good and Evil, Eli Sagan (1988) argues that conscience and superego are distinct psychic structures that frequently conflict. Because Freud associated morality with the superego and immorality with the id, he never clearly grasped that in order to advance toward a mature and responsible moral outlook we must overcome the “immoral morality” of the merely conventional (often racist, sexist, heterosexist, etc.), authoritarian and tyrannical superego. In this paper, the author elaborates upon Sagan's contrast between the superego, based on identification with the aggressor and fueled by hate, and the conscience, based on identification with the nurturer and driven by attachment and love. A typology is offered differentiating and illustrating the operation of nine distinct types of guilt.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.