Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Opatow, B. (1999). Affect and the Integration Problem of Mind and Brain. Neuropsychoanalysis, 1(1):97-110.

(1999). Neuropsychoanalysis, 1(1):97-110

Affect and the Integration Problem of Mind and Brain

Barry Opatow

The body cannot determine the mind to thought, neither can the mind determine the body to motion nor rest, nor to anything else, if there be anything else [Spinoza, Ethics III, Prop. 2].

Introduction

For whom is there an integration problem of mind and brain? I mean the really important theoretical problem. Not the merely practical dilemmas attending the torments of hunger, sex, and the terror of death. If we, as theorists, take metaphysical monism as a regulatory principle for science, we say that mind and brain are ultimately one. We hold consciousness and matter to be the same thing, even though we do not know (nor can even imagine) how such identity could possibly be made intelligible (McGinn, 1991; Searle, 1992). How can subjective experience be explained in objective terms? Or, the question has been aptly put, how can technicolor phenomenology arise from soggy grey matter? (McGinn, 1991, p. 1). Or, how can the firing of C fibers be understood as, necessarily, pain? (Kripke, 1971). This basic oneness in nature becomes, we say, something frightfully difficult (Nagel, 1986), or the most vexing of all questions (Damasio, 1994), or the most difficult problem there is, or ever was (LeDoux, 1996), or the ultimate mystery (Edelman, 1992), only as we strive to apprehend it. The difficulty is posited to fall within us, in the limited capacity of our present conceptual resources. We willingly take on this deficiency in order to preserve a belief in the unity of Being and sustain the hope of a progressive unification of scientific knowledge.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.