Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see who cited a particular article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To see what papers cited a particular article, click on “[Who Cited This?] which can be found at the end of every article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Graff-Radford, N. (2000). A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Confabulation Commentary by Neill Graff-Radford. Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):148-150.

(2000). Neuropsychoanalysis, 2(2):148-150

A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective on Confabulation Commentary by Neill Graff-Radford Related Papers

Neill Graff-Radford, MBBCh, FRCP

Dr. John DeLuca has written a scholary review of the cognitive neuroscience perspective of confabulation, while Dr. Mark Solms has made a compelling case that many of the features characterizing confabulation are found in Freud's model of the unconscious mind.With these articles in mind, and from a pragmatic point of view, it is important to ask the following questions about confabulations: What are they? What are the known causes? Do we know the anatomy of the lesion(s) causing them? Why do they occur? What are the associated features?

What Are They?

Dr. DeLuca has used the Moscovitch and Melo (1997) definition of statements or actions that involve unintentional but obvious distortions.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.