Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To find a specific quote…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Trying to find a specific quote? Go to the Search section, and write it using quotation marks in “Search for Words or Phrases in Context.”

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Shapiro, T. (2010). The Bicameral Brain and the Conflicted Mind and Their Relation to Suggestion and Hypnosis. Neuropsychoanalysis, 12(1):35-38.

(2010). Neuropsychoanalysis, 12(1):35-38

The Bicameral Brain and the Conflicted Mind and Their Relation to Suggestion and Hypnosis Related Papers

Commentary by
Theodore Shapiro

Three issues suggested by Raz & Wolfson are illuminated and discussed: (1) Differences between cognitive and dynamic unconscious and their relationship to the history of Freud's original neurological frame of reference; his abandonment of the “Project” as a basis for clinical work and the later post-Freudian attempts to link conflict-based ego psychology to the conflict-free sphere of thought. (2). Discreteness of levels of inquiry from the vantage of instrumentation and technique, as well as the need to keep separate the language of the varied domains that are studied. (3) Suggestion, transference, and dialogue are intertwined, but the historic sequences of their emergence are important to understand Freud's need to disavow suggestion. The independence of free association from suggestion and the significance of repression in Freud's theory would be untenable if all he was doing was infusing the clinical field with preformed suggestions. The new method demanded discovery of what had been repressed for the demonstration Freud intended.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.