Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Boxer, P. (2019). Challenging Impossibilities: Using the Plus-One Process to Explore Leadership Dilemmas. Organ. Soc. Dyn., 19(1):81-102.

(2019). Organizational and Social Dynamics, 19(1):81-102

Challenging Impossibilities: Using the Plus-One Process to Explore Leadership Dilemmas

Philip Boxer, BSc, MBA, Ph.D.

The disruptive effects of digital technology are enabling all environments to become more turbulent, putting competitive pressure on organisations to move towards addressing the demands of their clients one-by-one. This article considers situations where this pressure cannot be ignored, for example in the provision of intensive social care to individuals, or in enabling each disadvantaged university student to gain access to the full scope of its opportunities.

A network of relationships aligned at its edge to the particular demands of a client needs tripartite leadership that is vertically accountable to the powers-that-be, horizontally responsive to the client situation being addressed, and effective in the way it collaborates within the network itself. This involves holding dilemmas between vertical accountabilities and horizontal demands. This becomes impossible when the situation is framed solely in terms of vertical accountabilities.

This article describes a witnessed plus-one process undertaken by an individual at an edge. It works from her personal valency for challenging such an impossibility to explore the ways in which the dilemma in the situation was being “set up” by how it was held by the wider system. This example is used to explore the thinking behind the process and discusses its implications for leadership.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2018 and more current articles see the publishers official website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.