Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:


  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

de Mijolla, A. (2002). Foreword. Psychoanal. Hist., 4(1):3-4.

(2002). Psychoanalysis and History, 4(1):3-4

Articles: Meeting of the IAHP


Alain de Mijolla, M.D.

Psychoanalysis is in crisis. That pronouncement is often heard or read. But what is most frequently forgotten is that it has always been shaken by crises, often described as ringing its death knell. This has been going on since the very beginning of Freud's research. The history of psychoanalysis has been punctuated with crises: with the outside world, alternating between downright hostility or a state of rapture, being excessively seduced by the siren song of fashion; within the evolving movement itself in which ideas and strong personalities have always been wont to clash; crises that have also permanently rocked the framework of the psychoanalytical cure, and, as I have often underscored, there has always been the necessity of ‘managing conscious and unconscious conflicts’ created and maintained by the transference situation in the repetition of childhood events.

How did the first Freudians, and their successors, respond generation after generation to these conflicts, unveiled even as they elaborated their theories and made their clinical innovations? How did they adapt to the new fields of practice encountered throughout the century by way of the evolution of morals, socio-economic upheavals, political unrest, the tragedies and, consequently, the new forms of pathology that ensued? These questions are not purely academic, but must lead to the future, to the need for psychoanalysis to adjust to the ever-changing world, so that it remains compatible with the preservation and enrichment of its essential hypotheses—which Freud in 1923 designated as its ‘pillars’:

The acceptance of unconscious psychical processes, the recognition of the doctrine of resistance and repression, and taking sexuality and the Oedipus complex into account are the principal contents of psychoanalysis and the foundation of its theory, and whoever cannot subscribe to all of them should not be counted among psychoanalysts.


[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.