Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Feldman, S.S. (1954). Motives of 'Minor Offense' in Two Dreams. Psychoanal Q., 23:240-242.

(1954). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 23:240-242

Motives of 'Minor Offense' in Two Dreams

S. S. Feldman, M.D.

SUMMARY

The dreams of two adult male patients contained the expression, 'minor offense'. 1. The offense was 'minor' to the child, but to his parents it was a major offense. 2. The offense took place when the dreamer was a minor. 3. The phrase refers to sexual relations with minors. 4. The 'minor' is a disguise for the mother. 5. The offense was felt in childhood to be a major one, but there was a wish to minimize the offense and deny the guilt.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.