Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Macalpine, I. (1954). Psychoanalysis and the Occult: Edited by George Devereux. New York: International Universities Press, Inc., 1953. 432 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 23:268-270.

(1954). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 23:268-270

Psychoanalysis and the Occult: Edited by George Devereux. New York: International Universities Press, Inc., 1953. 432 pp.

Review by:
Ida Macalpine

The naïve reader may expect of this anthology evidence that psychoanalysis has lifted the veil from 'the occult' as it has from such erstwhile occult phenomena as dreams. Far from it! Nor does the volume purpose to prove by psychoanalysis that 'psi phenomena' exist. The editor makes clear that he collected 'quite specifically psychoanalytic studies of so-called psi phenomena, and these must therefore be viewed primarily as contributions to the theory and practice of clinical psychoanalysis'. It is accordingly fair to review this book as 'a contribution to one aspect of psychoanalytic technique'.

Of course questions of psychoanalytic technique can be raised only after the reader has decided whether or not he believes in the existence and clinical importance of telepathy and the occult. To the clarification of this indispensable premise, the greater part of the book is devoted. This editorial dilemma runs on and on, with much proving—and less disproving—the reality of the occult, and tedious, often repetitive discussions as to what constitutes absolute proof of extrasensory perception and communication. Ellis, the only nonanalyst included, brings weighty arguments to a demonstration of the unsoundness of some of the evidence. Perhaps his most important point is that mathematical and statistical evidence (such as that obtained at Duke University, which Eisenbud believes 'simply has to stand') does not raise psi phenomena above scrutiny. Collapse of the whole structure is still, one feels, a possibility.

Although the volume contains not all, but only a selection, of the psychoanalytic contributions to the subject, those that are included show a breath-taking inequality. The four papers by Freud (one of them here translated for the first time) present a measured and guarded attitude in striking contrast to such journalistic statements as, 'Here indeed was a thrilling finish to our telepathic steeplechase with more excitement than we had originally bargained for' (Eisenbud, p. 235).

The evidence produced is not likely to persuade the sober-minded that telepathy exists; this the editor did not intend. But he has failed in his intention of clarifying its use in psychoanalytic practice.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.