Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To contact support with questions…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always contact us directly by sending an email to support@p-e-p.org.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

(1962). Meetings of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York. Psychoanal Q., 31:305-306.

(1962). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 31:305-306

Meetings of the Psychoanalytic Association of New York

November 20, 1961. MUSCLE ACTION AS NONVERBAL AND PREVERBAL COMMUNICATIONS. Edwin Corbin, M.D.

Dr. Corbin discussed the role of muscle action as a regressive form of communication substituting for verbalization, in a twenty-three-year-old patient's relations to her child and to her analyst. The patient suffered from trembling hands, muscle spasms in her chest and legs, and pharyngeal spasms. She frequently assumed a masculine posture in intercourse, accompanied by fantasies of destroying her husband's penis by contractions of her vaginal musculature.

Most of the material presented came from a study of the effects of the patient's muscular behavior on her children, as reported in her analysis. She felt that her tense, tight holding of her infant made him cry after a few minutes at the breast. This symptom in the child was cured when analysis revealed that she was erotically stimulated during the nursing, and had unconscious fantasies in which her breasts were equated with penetrating penises. Further difficulties occurred during bowel training of the child. Her identification with him in his anal-erotic pleasure in stool retention was communicated to the child by way of her teasing presence near the toilet and her overzealous wiping of the boy's anus. After her intense anal-erotic fixations were analyzed the child's training was easily accomplished. Anal-erotic stimulations between the patient and her father were communicated to her child by action rather than verbalization.

The patient used words poorly, talked softly, and was often silent. In analysis, talking inaudibly and ramblingly was a defense against free association. Many oralsadistic fantasies appeared in the transference.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.