Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Hanowsky, J.A. (1988). Psychoanalytic Review, LXII, 1985: A Question of Bedrock: Is Penis Envy The Bottom Line? Roberta Satow. Pp. 265-275.. Psychoanal Q., 57:471-471.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: Psychoanalytic Review, LXII, 1985: A Question of Bedrock: Is Penis Envy The Bottom Line? Roberta Satow. Pp. 265-275.

(1988). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 57:471-471

Psychoanalytic Review, LXII, 1985: A Question of Bedrock: Is Penis Envy The Bottom Line? Roberta Satow. Pp. 265-275.

Jerome A. Hanowsky

In the midst of the continuing controversy on the place of penis envy in psychoanalytic thinking, Satow presents two cases which she considers to show that penis envy consists of condensed derivatives of earlier conflicts usually narcissistic in nature. She believes that penis envy is not merely a regressive effort to resolve oedipal conflicts but also an attempt to resolve even earlier conflicts.

- 471 -

Article Citation

Hanowsky, J.A. (1988). Psychoanalytic Review, LXII, 1985. Psychoanal. Q., 57:471-471

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.