Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Prager, J. (1996). Theory, Culture, and Society. X, 1993. Pp. 103-126. Gender, Desire and Child Sexual Abuse: Accounting for the Male Majority. A. M. Liddle.. Psychoanal Q., 65:668.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65:668

Theory, Culture, and Society. X, 1993. Pp. 103-126. Gender, Desire and Child Sexual Abuse: Accounting for the Male Majority. A. M. Liddle.

Review by:
Jeffrey Prager

The empirical literature on child sexual abuse has identified that men are far more likely to be perpetrators than women. However, there has been no attempt in the literature to theorize the relationship between child sexual abuse, gender, and the social construction of masculine desire. The social character of sexual abuse is developed through reference to feminist theories of masculine sexuality, Foucault's theories of sexuality and power, and Connell's work on the social organization of sexual desire. These theoretical tools are deployed to understand the masculinization of bodies within historically contingent hegemonic gender regimes. The author, however, argues against social theories of masculinity which close off the possibilities for male agency, mediation, and resistance to dominant social constructions. It is asserted that the male majority in the perpetration of child sexual abuse can be accounted for by structures of gender power which equate male adequacy with the expression of sexual desire as performance and achievement. By way of conclusion, the author calls for further investigation and theorization through a “practice-based sociology of masculinity” which would link child sexual abuse to the formation of “personality, desire and the social construction of gender.”

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.