Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by Rankā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bouchard, M. (1996). Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis. I, Number 2, 1993. The Influence of Dyadic Factors on Enactments and Other Regressive Forms of Acting Out. Douglas H. Frayn. Pp. 61-83.. Psychoanal Q., 65:672.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65:672

Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis. I, Number 2, 1993. The Influence of Dyadic Factors on Enactments and Other Regressive Forms of Acting Out. Douglas H. Frayn. Pp. 61-83.

Review by:
Marc-André Bouchard

Acting out has a variety of current usages; aspects of this concept were previously subsumed under acting out, acting in, actualization, and the more subtle collusion and treatment misalliances. All denote some form of repeating and putting into behavior, rather than remembering and verbalizing the original conflicts, and in that sense are considered resistances.

The various forms of acting out are examined. Actualization signifies a patient's (unilateral) motor or physiological activity that represents regressive reliving of transference fantasies within the analytic situation. The emphasis is on the patient rather than on the dyadic interaction. Two basic differences between actualization and enactment are identified: (1) in the actualization the analyst does not co-regress with the patient, and (2) the analyst is not destined to act in a spontaneous way that has meaning only after the fact. Enactment is a nonverbal communication that manifests itself symbolically through motor movements or autonomic nervous system discharge and brings about a behavioral response from the therapist. Enactment always involves symbolic behavioral interactions between patient and therapist which have unconscious meanings for both parties. It is therefore an interpersonal event, whether the analyst enters into the enactment as the frustrator or as the gratifier of the infantile demand. Enactment is also used loosely as a nonpejorative substitute for the older term acting out: it is defined as taking place whenever the analysand acts and stimulates the analyst to act rather than to report or put into words. An enactment may also be an attempt by the patient to gratify transference needs, combined with an unconscious reparenting activity by the therapist. Caution is always required, since attempts to make behavioral reparations do not replace verbal, but crucial, working through of transference and constructions from the past.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.