Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: Downloads should look similar to the originals…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Downloadable content in PDF and ePUB was designed to be read in a similar format to the original articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Chiarandini, I.C. (1996). Revista de Psicoanálisis. (Argentina) Special International Issue, 1993: Repetition.. Psychoanal Q., 65:850-851.
Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing: Revista de Psicoanálisis. (Argentina) Special International Issue, 1993: Repetition.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 65:850-851

Revista de Psicoanálisis. (Argentina) Special International Issue, 1993: Repetition.

Irene Cairo Chiarandini

What prompted Freud to restrict the hegemony of the pleasure principle, which had so enlarged the comprehension of human phenomena? Philosophers long before him had agreed on the importance of the search for pleasure. The ethical question was: what pleasures were worthy for humans, and what pain should be endured for the good of a worthy pleasure? As we know, Freud used five sources of evidence connected with the repetition compulsion: traumatic neuroses, dreams, infantile play, transference neuroses, and fate neuroses. In regard to the pleasure principle he transformed a neurological description—in terms of discharge—to a psychological description: that wishes, derived from drives, aim for a behavior adapted to satisfaction.

The author explores what he considers to be the problems with Freud's thinking in regard to the pleasure principle, the repetition compulsion, and the death instinct. He believes that theoretical problems are indeed created by abandoning the Freudian hypothesis of the death instinct. For instance, it becomes necessary to find alternative explanations of the severity of conscience to those offered by Freud in 1923. Similarly, we change our understanding of Kleinian ideas about the schizoparanoid position. All this serves as prologue, however, to a clinical proposition: the thesis that whatever their genesis, fate neuroses are only a form of borderline neurosis: they share problems in reality testing and impulsivity.

Three detailed clinical examples illustrate this thesis. In the first, compulsive acts that seem manifestations of a fate neurosis are explained through unconscious

- 850 -

anxiety that operates within the boundaries of the pleasure principle, inflicting a “lesser pain” to avoid a catastrophe. In the second, the dynamics are similar, the pathology less severe, resembling forms in which all neurotics sacrifice their capacity for fulfillment and pleasure to gratify feelings of guilt. In the third clinical case, the understanding is achieved through viewing the patient's “self castration” as a stratagem, a falsification, to disguise oedipal wishes. The feminine identification was a narcissistic defense (as described by Chasseguet-Smirgel in 1984), in this example not strong enough to constitute a perversion but sufficient to “fool” the father in its Promethean, almost manic intensity. In previous work Hanly postulated an aggressive instinct activated by frustration of object or narcissistic libido, or ego instincts. Here he argues that fate neuroses do not prove a kind of repetition compulsion that would justify the hypothesis of the death instinct. Discussing also Loewald's ideas about obsessive compulsions and repetition compulsion, the author postulated that disturbed adaptation and expectations regarding the objects are sufficient to determine recurrent self-destructive behaviors. Finally, the author reflects on the subject of establishing criteria to evaluate psychoanalytic hypotheses.

- 851 -

Article Citation

Chiarandini, I.C. (1996). Revista de Psicoanálisis.. Psychoanal. Q., 65:850-851

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.