Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Shopper, M. (2003). The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial. By Michael L. Perlin, J.D. Washington, DC: Amer. Psychological Assn., 2000. 328 pp.. Psychoanal Q., 72(4):1082-1088.

(2003). Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 72(4):1082-1088

The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial. By Michael L. Perlin, J.D. Washington, DC: Amer. Psychological Assn., 2000. 328 pp.

Review by:
Moisy Shopper

By any measure, Michael Perlin is an authority on mental health and the law. He is on the faculty of both medical and law schools, has served in governmental and advisory agencies, and is the author of numerous law review articles and several books. In 1990, he was awarded the Walter Jeffords Writing Prize for his three- volume work on Mental Disability Law: Civil and Criminal. In 1994-1995, his book entitled The Jurisprudence of the Insanity Defense won the Manfred Guttmacher Award of the American Psychiatric Association and the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, as the best book of the year in law and forensic psychiatry.

In The Hidden Prejudice: Mental Disability on Trial, Perlin makes a comprehensive sweep of the legal concepts impinging on the mentally disabled, convincingly demonstrating the profound and distorting effect of prejudice and irrational thinking within the law. He reminds us that the issues involved in mental disability law have implications reaching into many other areas of constitutional law, criminal law, and social policy. Yet significant decisions are often reached by what Perlin calls “vividness”: a form of erroneous reasoning that unduly relies on cases that are unusual, are dramatic, or achieve public notoriety. As a result, rational thinking is overwhelmed and replaced by the assumption that the dramatic case is typical and statistically valid for the entire group.

The author's mission is to ferret out the dual errors of sanism and pretextuality from the cognition and reasoning of lawyers, judges, legislators, and the general public, and to combat the prejudices and errors—rampant in the legal system—that so adversely influence decisions affecting the mentally disabled. Sanism refers to irrational prejudice toward the mentally ill.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.