Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: Downloads should look similar to the originals…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Downloadable content in PDF and ePUB was designed to be read in a similar format to the original articles.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rubovits-Seitz, P. (1986). Clinical Interpretation, Hermeneutics and the Problem of Validation. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 9(1):3-42.

(1986). Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 9(1):3-42

Clinical Interpretation, Hermeneutics and the Problem of Validation

Dr. Philip Rubovits-Seitz, M.D.

Hermeneutics is the art and science of interpreting meanings, as in literary analysis, legal commentary, biblical exegesis, and so forth. Hermeneutic scholars have been studying the problems, methods, and principles of interpretation for centuries. Ricoeur (1970) traces two separate historical roots of hermeneutics: Aristotle's treatise, On Interpretation, and the long tradition of biblical exegesis by religious scholars. Despite its title, Aristotle's treatise does not deal with interpretation per se but focuses upon any vocal sound having significance. A concept appears in Aristotle's Metaphysics, however, that anticipates a theory of interpretation based upon understanding of multiple meanings: [Aristotle's] famous distinction of the many meanings of being opens a breach in the theory of univocity (Ricoeur, 1970, pp. 24-25).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.