Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To receive notifications about new content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to receive notifications about new content in PEP Web? For more information about this feature, click here

To sign up to PEP Web Alert for weekly emails with new content updates click click here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Burke, W.F. (1992). Countertransference Disclosure and the Asymmetry/Mutuality Dilemma. Psychoanal. Dial., 2(2):241-271.

(1992). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 2(2):241-271

Countertransference Disclosure and the Asymmetry/Mutuality Dilemma

Walter F. Burke, Ph.D.

No single issue illustrates more clearly the interpersonal therapist's struggle between asymmetry and mutuality than countertransference disclosure. On a theoretical plane, all versions of interpersonal psychoanalysis share a comfortable tolerance for a central dynamic tension between the mutual influence of the participants and the asymmetry inherent in a relationship that emphasizes understanding the motivations of only one participant. This same marriage of concepts has, however, been a source of considerable confusion within the area of technique. The practitioner is charged with the technical implementation of the theory and must define the line between asymmetry and mutuality in everyday interactions with patients. Difficulty tolerating the ambiguity caused by the tension between asymmetry and mutuality results in the understandable urge to seek a definitive and unwavering position on countertransference disclosure.

Dimensions of the therapist's struggle include complex decisions concerning the primary unit of study (patient or relationship), the sequence of exploring new and old object transference experience, the use of disclosure with or without concurrent understanding, an assessment of the patient's capacities to tolerate disclosure, and, lastly, the initiation and frequency of disclosure interventions. An integrative perspective on the tension between mutuality and asymmetry allows the dialectical relationship between these principles to reach a constantly evolving equilibrium unique to each patient based on the moment of clinical interaction.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.