Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Stern, D.B. (1996). Dissociation and Constructivism: Commentary on Papers by Davies and Harris. Psychoanal. Dial., 6(2):251-266.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 6(2):251-266

Dissociation and Constructivism: Commentary on Papers by Davies and Harris Related Papers

Donnel B. Stern, Ph.D.

Dr. davies and dr. harris have divided up between them the two sets of issues that dominate contemporary discussions of memories of childhood sexual abuse. On one hand, we have the clinical problem, which most of Davies's paper addresses: How do we help these people? On the other hand, we have the conceptual issue, which is the topic of most of Harris's paper: How should we understand the issues of memory in these difficult cases? Unfortunately, however, we are not free to focus all our energies on these thorny problems, because it has become necessary for anyone who wants to take on the issues in this field to deal with their detractors, the proponents of the so-called false memory syndrome, who claim that most memories of childhood sexual abuse recovered in the course of psychotherapy are perpetrated—consciously or unconsciously—by egregiously overzealous psychotherapists.

We have needed Harris's paper for some time now. It is not difficult for a clinician to take issue with the more extreme advocates of the false memory syndrome, because most of us have simply seen enough in our practices to be convinced that false memories of sexual abuse—at least in the absence of a therapist's explicit or implicit encouragement of such memories, which I think everyone involved in this debate deplores—are the rare exception. But rebutting the false memory argument requires a good deal more than clinical experience and contrary convictions; it requires a close examination of the relevant research findings and the thinking that support the perspective.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.