Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Black, M.J. (2003). Afterword. Psychoanal. Dial., 13(3):367-375.

(2003). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(3):367-375

Afterword

Margaret J. Black

Psychoanalytic Supervision, Probably More Than Any Other Aspect of our field, carries the tradition of our profession. The supervisor has a hefty responsibility. Charged with knowing and effectively teaching the theory of psychoanalysis, creatively integrating that theory into psychoanalytic technique, modeling the best of a psychoanalytic process by effectively guiding the student's clinical work, the supervisor is also expected to interact with the supervisee in an intellectually evocative, curiosity-inducing, respectful yet challenging, growth-promoting manner. Holding both the wisdom of the past and the felt revolutions of the present, the supervisor sees in the supervisee a potential emissary to the future with capacity to contain, enliven, and further develop the brilliant clinical sensibilities that have characterized the best of psychoanalytic practice.

Sweeping change and reformulation in theory and technique have characterized our particular tenure in the field. It's impact on the project of supervision and on the experience of the supervisee trying to learn the complex craft of clinical psychoanalysis is still under consideration. Historically students were envisioned as undergoing personal transformation during psychoanalytic training, creating multiple identifications in the process, but eventually yielding, perhaps to the prevailing tradition of their training institutes or to the powerful identificatory pull of the transference to their training analysts, and organizing around a particular established theoretical model. We can easily appreciate the dilemma of students coming of age in this culture of theoretical diversity. Now the voices of mentors with whom a student might identify are not only multiple but often contradictory. And, I might add, the field continues to change.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.