Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Aron, L. (2003). The Paradoxical Place of Enactment in Psychoanalysis: Introduction. Psychoanal. Dial., 13(5):623-631.

(2003). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13(5):623-631

The Paradoxical Place of Enactment in Psychoanalysis: Introduction

Lewis Aron, Ph.D.

Like So Many Psychoanalytic Ideas, Our Conceptualization of enactment is inherently paradoxical and contains an important tension that we are always in danger of losing. The clash is between defining enactment narrowly so that it maintains specific meaning and is thought to represent only episodic, discrete events, or defining it so broadly as to alert us to the ubiquity of unconscious interpersonal mutual influence and in so doing turning all of analysis into one huge enactment.

On one side, we are correct to ask, “What is not an enactment? Isn't all of psychoanalysis an extended enactment?” All the contributors to this symposium take for granted that enactments occur regularly in psychoanalysis, that enactments can be analytically productive, and that understanding the inevitability and usefulness of enactments should help analysts to feel less shameful and less guilty about finding themselves caught up in them.

Recognizing that speech is action and actions are forms of communication (for a brief history of this distinction, see Greenberg, 1996), we have largely come to accept the deconstruction of the sharp split between speech and action. Ferenczi was the most important pioneer in deconstructing the dichotomization of words and deeds (see Harris and Aron, 1997).

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.