Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Frommer, M.S. (2009). The Impact of the Analyst's Existential Exposure: Commentary on Paper by Stuart A. Pizer. Psychoanal. Dial., 19(1):69-79.

(2009). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 19(1):69-79

The Impact of the Analyst's Existential Exposure: Commentary on Paper by Stuart A. Pizer

Martin Stephen Frommer, Ph.D.

The concept of existential exposure speaks to those encounters in which our generally successful efforts to avoid the full knowledge of our human condition utterly fail us. Despite our denial and the usually reliable dissociative mechanisms we use to support it, the truth of our unprotected, vulnerable state becomes psychically real. I make use of Pizer's narrative about his medical crisis and its impact on his analytic self states to explore how body/mind alterations that constituted his experience of existential exposure affected his analytic subjectivity and the evolving intersubjectivity with his patient. I suggest that the experience of existential exposure is registered through the body, which is the medium through which disembodied abstractions about existence are made real. Dysregulation in the body creates a powerful psychic disequilibrium marked by the loss of omnipotence and control. When they are not so overwhelming as to produce trauma, these destabilizing experiences can foster the emergence of new self states that reflect greater flexibility, elasticity, and freedom in one's sense of self. I underscore the complex intersubjective impact of the analyst's embodied experience of existential exposure: how it shifted the transference/countertransference by introducing an “existential Third” into the treatment, leveled the playing field between patient and analyst, and may have served not only to expand but also to constrict aspects of the analyst's subjectivity.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.