Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rappoport, E. (2012). Creating the Umbilical Cord: Relational Knowing and the Somatic Third. Psychoanal. Dial., 22(3):375-388.
  

(2012). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22(3):375-388

Creating the Umbilical Cord: Relational Knowing and the Somatic Third

Evelyn Rappoport, Psy.D.

This paper examines and clinically highlights the co-creation of an attachment bond between patient and analyst through the activation and regulation of somatic body experiences in both members of the dyad. Through clinical case material I highlight working from within the implicit, relational field in the treatment of Kathleen, a patient who presents with extreme dissociation and a history of profound attachment disruption. The attachment or “umbilical cord” is developed by linking felt states of the analyst and patient, and by enabling the patient (and at times the analyst) to reclaim dissociated body sensations. Integrating attachment research, neurobiology and affect regulation, the place of implicit relational knowing, becomes accessed through somatic experience before it can be verbalized and articulated. Dissociation from self and others requires the therapist to access the self states of the patient through somatic tracking and sensations, lending the therapist's nervous system to the patient as a resource for interactive, mutual regulation. It is in the space of implicit procedural knowing that interactive regulation can take place, generating mutual intersubjective recognition, that is, “the analytic third.” Finally, it is through mutual recognition that individual subjectivities can coexist surviving bidirectional rupture, thereby, creating and sustaining attachment between two embodied subjectivities.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.