Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Pauley, D. (2019). The Fee and the Analyst’s Life Cycle: Reply to Berger and Sopher. Psychoanal. Dial., 29(5):591-593.

(2019). Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 29(5):591-593

The Fee and the Analyst’s Life Cycle: Reply to Berger and Sopher

David Pauley, LCSW

This response develops some further thoughts on the fee and its relationship to the analyst’s life cycle. Sigmund Freud’s letters to Karl Abraham from 1912 provide a window into how he thought about issues such as the fee, work–life balance and the place of writing and other efforts to give back to the profession. These same themes are fated to be re-discovered – as if for the first time – by each successive generation.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.