Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To copy parts of an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To copy a phrase, paragraph, or large section of an article, highlight the text with the mouse and press Ctrl + C. Then to paste it, go to your text editor and press Ctrl + V.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Dauphin, J. (2017). Differentiation Between Schizophreniform Configurations and Psychotic Personality Structures. Psychodyn. Psych., 45(2):187-215.

(2017). Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 45(2):187-215

Differentiation Between Schizophreniform Configurations and Psychotic Personality Structures

Julie Dauphin, Ph.D.

The symptom overlap between primary psychotic and severe personality disorders renders timely diagnosis challenging, which often results in ambiguous treatment and poorly defined outcomes. Kernberg's (1984) structural model of personality, treating symptoms as a non-pathognomonic higher order construct, has much contributed to our understanding of the nature of some severe disorders, highlighting fundamental facets of personality function. However, the model's main focus is on borderline personality organization and thus offers an incomplete formulation of psychotic structure. With regard to the psychotic structure, two distinct pathological disorders are currently confounded and need to be distinguished: (1) the authentic psychotic structures, mainly resulting from failures in early relational and affective development, and (2) schizophreniform configurations, mostly derived from a neurodevelopmental etiology. This differentiation, while specifying the notion of psychotic personality structure, takes into consideration: (a) the role of temperament bias, hypersensitity in particular; (b) dissimilar productions in response to projective testing, such as the Rorschach inkblot test; (c) differential processes in response to psychotherapy, including typical transferential manifestations; (d) differential symptom presentation. Key criteria to facilitate the differential diagnosis with severely regressed borderline structures are suggested. Clinical material illustrates the application of the proposed revised model. Therapeutic implications are discussed.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the article. PEP-Web provides full-text search of the complete articles for current and archive content, but only the abstracts are displayed for current content, due to contractual obligations with the journal publishers. For details on how to read the full text of 2016 and more current articles see the publishers official website.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.