Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use Pocket to save bookmarks to PEP-Web articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Pocket (formerly “Read-it-later”) is an excellent third-party plugin to browsers for saving bookmarks to PEP-Web pages, and categorizing them with tags.

To save a bookmark to a PEP-Web Article:

  • Use the plugin to “Save to Pocket”
  • The article referential information is stored in Pocket, but not the content. Basically, it is a Bookmark only system.
  • You can add tags to categorize the bookmark to the article or book section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Jaffe, D.S. (1982). Aggression: Instinct, Drive, Behavior. Psychoanal. Inq., 2(1):77-94.

(1982). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 2(1):77-94

Aggression: Instinct, Drive, Behavior

Daniel S. Jaffe, M.D.

That a satisfactory theory of aggression still eludes scientists in the field of animal and human behavior is evident from the frequently polemical tones encountered in the ever-growing literature of the various disciplines. There is no consensus on whether aggression is innate or learned, appetitive or instrumental, or what its role and moving force may be in developmental sequences in man. In my discussion of some familiar issues and my attempt to present some synthesizing viewpoints regarding aggression, the role of classes of instinct in psychoanalytic theory and the place to be assigned to aggression constitute my primary focus. I reconsider (1) some aspects of Freud's early and later formulations of instinct; (2) a basis for revising the classification of instincts, including some further distinctions between instincts and drives; and (3) a new approach to the place of aggression in this reformulation of instincts.

Instincts and Drives

The problems connected with any attempt to translate the word Trieb, which Freud used to refer to instincts, have been discussed by Strachey (1966) who stated that his choice of the term instinct was based on its very vagueness. He viewed this as an advantage because the term would be flexible enough to encompass many meanings.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.