Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see definitions for highlighted words…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Some important words in PEP Web articles are highlighted when you place your mouse pointer over them. Clicking on the words will display a definition from a psychoanalytic dictionary in a small window.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Grotstein, J.S. (1988). A Critique of Borderline Patients: Psychoanalytic Perspectives. Psychoanal. Inq., 8(3):422-437.

(1988). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 8(3):422-437

A Critique of Borderline Patients: Psychoanalytic Perspectives Related Papers

James S. Grotstein, M.D.

This monograph of the Kris Study group of New York represents a noteworthy, diligent, and candid effort by classical psychoanalysts of the American School, obviously steeped in the perspective of ego psychology and the hegemony of the Oedipus complex, to come to grips with the challenges to American classical theory imposed by the borderline entity. The interest in the borderline disorder came about in no small measure from the Menninger Psychotherapy Research Project (Kernberg et al., 1972), summarized by Wallerstein (1986). Interest has also been propelled by the influence of Kleinian and British Object Relations analysts as well as those in other parts of the world whose views of analysis were informed by psychoanalytic paradigms which allowed them to tread with confidence into the earlier recesses of infant development and, consequently, to be able meaningfully to decipher experiences in the vast array of primitive emotional feelings, thinking, and behavior as they present themselves in the consulting room and hospital.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.