Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Grand, C. Hill, D. (1994). Epilogue. Psychoanal. Inq., 14(2):313-318.
    

(1994). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 14(2):313-318

Epilogue

Carole Grand, Ph.D. and Daniel Hill, Ph.D.

Over the past 40 years, psychoanalysis in this country has experienced three major developments: ego psychology, theories of object relations based on attachment, and self psychology. The latter posit first principles that oppose those of classical theory. Each attempts to explain the influence of infantile sexuality and pleasure seeking as secondary to attachment and object seeking or to a superordinate self. Each claims comprehensiveness and effectiveness. Classical theory, as it developed into ego psychology has, in turn, attempted to expand existing ideas and incorporate contributions of object relations and self psychology. In this epilogue we use this attempt at constructing an all-inclusive, clinically oriented, psychoanalytic psychology as a point of reference for evaluating theories that use a multimodel approach.

As the title states, the aim of this issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry is to illuminate the possibilities and dangers in the clinical use of multiple models. We have chosen the work of Fred Pine and John Gedo to ground the discussion because they represent the two most developed multimodel approaches, which challenge the all-encompassing use of any one of the other schools of thought. Gedo has an overarching theory of mental functioning, development, pathogenesis, and technique. Pine has a clinical strategy that suggests but does not yet formalize a general theory of mind. Both have woven together divergent points of view into a system of integrated models.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.