Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Bernstein, S.B. Bornstein, M. Palmer, J. Rosenbaum, A.L. Westin, S. (2008). Prologue. Psychoanal. Inq., 28(4):401-403.

(2008). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28(4):401-403


Issue Editor:
Stephen B. Bernstein, M.D., Melvin Bornstein, M.D., Jonathan Palmer, M.D., Arthur L. Rosenbaum, M.D. and Sharen Westin, M.D.

The seeds for this issue of Psychoanalytic Inquiry were planted about fifteen years ago, when several of the authors (Bernstein, Bornstein, Rosenbaum) became aware that many contemporary psychoanalysts experienced difficulty and distress when they tried to describe their clinical work in writing, specifically during the process of certification by the American Psychoanalytic Association, but also in other arenas as well. As we read many of their clinical reports during this time, it became apparent to us that the clinical writing skills, which should have been acquired and practiced during analytic training, were often absent.

When we had the opportunity to speak with them, many analysts described their distress in detail. In addition to difficulties in selecting and organizing their material, they were troubled by not knowing how to approach the daunting task of opening and organizing numerous notebooks, reviving the intense experiences therein, and then trying to convey what had occurred in the analysis to an unknown reader. Their model for analytic writing was often based on the theoretical discussions and the short vignettes or summaries that they had read in our literature. The language that they had been taught to use in describing analysis was abstract and too distant from what they had actually experienced with their patient. They also told us of their feelings of fear and shame—concerns that what they wrote might not be “analytic enough,” or that their actual experience might not be acceptable to an unknown reader.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.