Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Young-Eisendrath, P. (2020). Therapeutic Impasse in a Famous Zen Case: Memorial Tribute for Jeremy Safran. Psychoanal. Inq., 40(5):360-366.

(2020). Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 40(5):360-366

Therapeutic Impasse in a Famous Zen Case: Memorial Tribute for Jeremy Safran

Polly Young-Eisendrath, Ph.D.

In this article, I examine the iconic Zen story of a meeting of the Buddhist master known as Bodhidharma with a Chinese emperor called Wu, in a paradoxical encounter about the nature of wisdom. I use the case as an example of a “therapeutic failure” because the two parties were never in contact with each other, but instead appeared to be locked into a projective identification. I set the stage for my analysis of this case by discussing Safran’s work on therapeutic impasse and my own understanding of idealization, splitting, and projective-identification as they apply to the case, as well as the many scandals in the contemporary Buddhist world that are framed by the desire for a flawless, pure and “enlightened” master.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.