Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To convert articles to PDF…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

At the top right corner of every PEP Web article, there is a button to convert it to PDF. Just click this button and downloading will begin automatically.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gillett, E. (1994). The Two Meanings of “Defense” Toward an Integration of Cognitive Psychology and Psychoanalytic Theory. Psychoanal. Psychol., 11(2):167-188.

(1994). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 11(2):167-188

The Two Meanings of “Defense” Toward an Integration of Cognitive Psychology and Psychoanalytic Theory

Eric Gillett, M.D.

This article uses concepts from cognitive psychology to illuminate an important distinction proposed by Wallerstein (1967, 1983) between defense mechanisms versus defense contents and behaviors, which differ in important ways with consequences for such theoretical issues as the pathogenicity of defense, the role of defense in supportive psychotherapy, and the sense in which defenses are unconscious. Although defense contents and behaviors can be unconscious in Freud's dynamic sense, an understanding of the unconscious status of defense mechanisms requires an extension of the concept of the unconscious to include what Sandler and Joffe (1969) called the “nonexperiential” (p. 81). Although Brenner argued against Wallerstein's distinction, this article shows how their differences can be resolved.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.