Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To bookmark an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to save an article in your browser’s Bookmarks for quick access? Press Ctrl + D and a dialogue box will open asking how you want to save it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Murray, J.F. (1995). On Objects, Transference, and Two-Person Psychology: A Critique of the New Seduction Theory. Psychoanal. Psychol., 12(1):31-41.

(1995). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 12(1):31-41

On Objects, Transference, and Two-Person Psychology: A Critique of the New Seduction Theory

James F. Murray, Ph.D.

Although object relations theory has become the dominant theoretical perspective in the psychoanalytic realm, weaknesses within the object relations perspective have not been examined sufficiently. In particular, the frequent lack of clarity as to whether a given reference to an “object” refers to an internal representation or an external figure has resulted in major problems, distortions, or misapplications in the clinical utilization of object relations theory. This lack of clarity has the effect of transferring the therapist's attention to the role of the external world at the expense of attending to the internal world and structure of the patient. This shift to the external interpersonal world has particular implications for models of transference and therapeutic intervention.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.