Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:

2015-11-06_09h28_31

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Freedman, N. Berzofsky, M. (1995). Shape of the Communicated Transference in Difficult and Not-So-Difficult Patients: Symbolized and Desymbolized Transference. Psychoanal. Psychol., 12(3):363-374.

(1995). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 12(3):363-374

Shape of the Communicated Transference in Difficult and Not-So-Difficult Patients: Symbolized and Desymbolized Transference

Norbert Freedman, Ph.D. and Michael Berzofsky, Ph.D.

In this article, we attempt to define a dimension of transference characteristic of “difficult” and “not-so-difficult” patients. The method is systematic–empirical as well as clinical. The conceptual thrust underlying our concept of communicated transference is derived from the literature of the communicative function of the dream. It is a wish to impart the inner objects, the introjects, into the consciousness of the listening analyst as object. Five variables or indices of symbolization were selected, and they yielded an interrelated set of observations. We were able to establish that there is an entity of difficult and not-so-difficult patient regardless of diagnostic category that exists not only in the subjective realm of a therapist experiencing the patient, but in the objective realm of coded text. Two clinical cases described by Bach (1985)—Mrs. Smith and Richard—are presented to illustrate the concepts described.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.