Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To go directly to an article using its bibliographical details…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you know the bibliographic details of a journal article, use the Journal Section to find it quickly. First, find and click on the Journal where the article was published in the Journal tab on the home page. Then, click on the year of publication. Finally, look for the author’s name or the title of the article in the table of contents and click on it to see the article.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Freedman, S. (1996). Role of Selfobject Experiences in Affective Development During Latency. Psychoanal. Psychol., 13(1):101-127.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 13(1):101-127

Role of Selfobject Experiences in Affective Development During Latency

Sarita Freedman, Ph.D.

The overall intent of this article was to investigate the nature of the selfobject experiences of latency-age children and their role in affective development. The self psychology literature was searched to identify the various selfobject experiences. Ten selfobject experiences were noted to be significant for affective development in latency: twinship, efficacy, cultural, phantasy, evoked, affective attunement, self-delineating, idealizing, mirroring, and protective prohibitory. The contemporary psychoanalytic, developmental, and psychosocial bodies of literature were searched to examine the vital issues and characteristics of affective development in latency, including the importance of activities and interests, in affective development. Five significant developmental tasks in the affective domain were identified: the creation and sensation of a sense of self as distinct from others, affect tolerance, the capacity to manage internal urges, the development of an internal locus-of-control orientation, and the capacity to enter into and sustain a state of latency. Cognitive and physiological development were noted as important factors in the child's ability to attain these capacities, and the division of latency into an early and late period was deemed to be important.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.