Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Golland, J.H. (1997). Not an Endgame: Terminations in Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Psychol., 14(2):259-270.

(1997). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 14(2):259-270

Not an Endgame: Terminations in Psychoanalysis

Jeffrey H. Golland, Ph.D.

For much of the history of psychoanalysis, the matter of termination received little attention. Freud's famous chess metaphor, offered in the paper devoted to the technique of beginning the treatment (1913), designated termination the endgame, which could be subject to “an exhaustive systematic presentation” (p 123). Freud did not take up that presentation, either at that time or later in his more philosophical paper specific to the subject (Freud, 1937). Ferenczi (1927) paid some attention to termination, bequeathing the notion that analyses would die from exhaustion. Annie Reich was astonished that these were the only two papers on the topic until her own (1950/1973), although seven other papers appear concurrent with hers in the International Journal. Glover's 1955 revision of his text was the first to define a termination phase per se, and Firestein's (1978) book was the first presentation of a series of extensive clinical examples to elucidate the process. Since then, the literature on termination has become quite extensive.

From the time of the endgame metaphor until recently, the relative absence of study paradoxically may have led to a sense that termination might, indeed, follow the metaphor. A few definable principles and variations would be available, as was seemingly true of analytic beginnings. Terminations would evolve, naturally, from properly conducted analyses; the phase would proceed from a mutually agreed-upon date and would include regression, reactivation of symptom complexes and a mourning process; the technique would be a continuation of transference and resistance analysis, especially regarding reactions to the fact of impending termination, with the only essential difference being the analyst's agreement to the actual date of ending.

This

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.