Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Langs, R. (2007). One Mind or Two: Divergent Views of the Home-Office Setting Commentary on. Psychoanal. Psychol., 24(1):180-186.

(2007). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24(1):180-186

One Mind or Two: Divergent Views of the Home-Office Setting Commentary on Maroda (2006) Related Papers

Robert Langs, M.D.

This article draws on the strong adaptive finding that the emotion-processing mind houses two relatively independent operating systems with very different perceptions, values, and adaptive preferences. In deciding ground rule issues, the conscious system is defensive, denial-prone, self-defeating, variable from one therapist to the next, and unreliable. In contrast, the deep unconscious system is relatively nondefensive, functions on the basis of archetypes and universals and is consistent across therapists, serves the best interests of all parties, and is trustworthy. This system universally experiences the home-office setting as a departure from the ideal, healing, archetypal frame and as harmful to all concerned.

It is little short of incredible to learn that Karen Maroda's presentation (Maroda, 2006) is one of the first classically oriented psychoanalytic articles dealing with questions pertaining to the practice of many psychoanalysts and psychotherapists (terms I shall use interchangeably) to see patients in some type of home-office setting. This is yet another aspect of the ground rules and boundaries of psychoanalysis that has been neglected by mainstream analysts. I greatly appreciate the opportunity to comment on and extend her article.

The use of a home-office setting raises framework and boundary issues that pertain to the ideal location of a therapist's office. This, in turn, is related to the ground rules pertaining to therapists' relative anonymity—the problem of the acceptable extent of their deliberate, rather than inescapable, self-revelations—and to the privacy and confidentiality of the therapy.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.