Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Suh, J.J. Ruffins, S. Robins, C.E. Albanese, M.J. Khantzian, E.J. (2008). Self-Medication Hypothesis: Connecting Affective Experience and Drug Choice. Psychoanal. Psychol., 25(3):518-532.

(2008). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(3):518-532

Self-Medication Hypothesis: Connecting Affective Experience and Drug Choice

Jesse J. Suh, Psy.D., Stephen Ruffins, Ph.D., C. Edward Robins, Ph.D., Mark J. Albanese, M.D. and Edward J. Khantzian, M.D.

According to E. J. Khantzian's (2003) self-medication hypothesis (SMH), a psychoanalytically informed theory of substance addiction that considers emotional and psychological dimensions, substance addiction functions as a compensatory means to modulate affects and self-soothe from the distressful psychological states. To manage emotional pain, dysphoria, and anxiety, substance abusers use the drug actions, both physiological and psychological effects, to achieve emotional stability. The SMH was retrospectively tested using 6 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2 special scales with 402 non—drug users and drug users to capture the psychological elements relevant to the SMH. Three logistic regression models were formed to predict alcohol, cocaine, and heroin “drug-of-choice” groups. Predicting variables were the Repression, Overcontrolled Hostility, Psychomotor Acceleration, Depression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Cynicism scales. Repression and, inversely, Depression scales significantly predicted the alcohol group. Psychomotor Acceleration was the only significant predictor of the cocaine group. Cynicism significantly predicted heroin preference. The results are partially consistent with the SMH. Implications of these results for understanding the relationship between affect regulation and addiction and treatment interventions are discussed.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.