Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To keep track of most popular articles…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can always keep track of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP Web by checking the PEP tab found on the homepage.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Suh, J.J. Ruffins, S. Robins, C.E. Albanese, M.J. Khantzian, E.J. (2008). Self-Medication Hypothesis: Connecting Affective Experience and Drug Choice. Psychoanal. Psychol., 25(3):518-532.
  

(2008). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 25(3):518-532

Self-Medication Hypothesis: Connecting Affective Experience and Drug Choice

Jesse J. Suh, Psy.D., Stephen Ruffins, Ph.D., C. Edward Robins, Ph.D., Mark J. Albanese, M.D. and Edward J. Khantzian, M.D.

According to E. J. Khantzian's (2003) self-medication hypothesis (SMH), a psychoanalytically informed theory of substance addiction that considers emotional and psychological dimensions, substance addiction functions as a compensatory means to modulate affects and self-soothe from the distressful psychological states. To manage emotional pain, dysphoria, and anxiety, substance abusers use the drug actions, both physiological and psychological effects, to achieve emotional stability. The SMH was retrospectively tested using 6 Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory—2 special scales with 402 non—drug users and drug users to capture the psychological elements relevant to the SMH. Three logistic regression models were formed to predict alcohol, cocaine, and heroin “drug-of-choice” groups. Predicting variables were the Repression, Overcontrolled Hostility, Psychomotor Acceleration, Depression, Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, and Cynicism scales. Repression and, inversely, Depression scales significantly predicted the alcohol group. Psychomotor Acceleration was the only significant predictor of the cocaine group. Cynicism significantly predicted heroin preference. The results are partially consistent with the SMH. Implications of these results for understanding the relationship between affect regulation and addiction and treatment interventions are discussed.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.