Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return from a journal’s Table of Contents to the Table of Volumes…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can return with one click from a journal’s Table of Contents (TOC) to the Table of Volumes simply by clicking on “Volume n” at the top of the TOC (where n is the volume number).

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rizzolo, G.S. (2012). Rethinking Tavistock: Enactment, the Analytic Third, and the Implications for Group Relations. Psychoanal. Psychol., 29(3):346-367.

(2012). Psychoanalytic Psychology, 29(3):346-367

Rethinking Tavistock: Enactment, the Analytic Third, and the Implications for Group Relations

Gregory S. Rizzolo, Ph.D.

The psychoanalytic exploration of group relations requires an orientation to the intersubjective nature of mental life. The Tavistock model of group relations provides a preliminary framework for thinking intersubjectively about the nature of experiences in groups. However, this model continues to depend on the questionable metaphor of the isolated mind as a container of reified mental contents, which can be passed around by means of projective identification. Furthermore, it continues to invoke the notion of a neutral analyst or consultant with privileged insight into the group's unconscious fantasy life. Through a critical discussion of this approach, the author attempts to begin a dialogue about intersubjectivity and its implications for the study and practice of group relations. He argues that an intersubjective approach requires one to look not at how reified mental contents are being moved around within a given group, but rather at how intersubjective experiences can be cocreated by the group members and their conference consultants. He focuses on how enactments between all of these participants can lead to a transformation of self and other through the experience of mutual subjugation and the emergence of a shared third space. In addition, he introduces the concept of the alien group self, a shared identity that the group can form to accommodate to the mindset of its consultants.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.