Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To find an Author in a Video…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To find an Author in a Video, go to the Search Section found on the top left side of the homepage. Then, select “All Video Streams” in the Source menu. Finally, write the name of the Author in the “Search for Words or Phrases in Context” area and click the Search button.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fonagy, P. (2009). Postscript. Psychoanal. Psychother., 23(3):276-280.

(2009). Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 23(3):276-280

Postscript

Peter Fonagy

It is never an easy task to summarize a set of papers when each paper would deserve the 2,000 words that the discussants have available, and each contribution triggers thoughts and associations sufficient to match each of the papers in terms of length, even if not in terms of quality. David Taylor's instruction was to provide a “real discussion” which elaborates the findings presented, and brings together some of the common themes to emerge from the papers.

The first point to make about this collection of excellent contributions concerns the duality already identified by Taylor in his preface. There appear to be numerous dichotomies that still characterize the field as represented in these papers which indicate that coherent integration may be more aspirational than a realistic goal. The first of these is developmental: childhood and adolescent depression is treated and studied separately from its adult counterpart in most of these papers as elsewhere in the literature, yet we know the two to be different faces of the same coin (e.g. Dunn & Goodyer, 2006). The separation of this collection of papers into child and adult sections is inevitable given the current state of the literature but seems to us to mark a regrettable reluctance on the part of our community to adopt a socio-neuro-developmental view of the disorder – reluctance probably born more from the constraints of service organisation than the limitations of current scientific knowledge.

A similar regrettable dichotomy emerges from laboratory versus clinical encounter oriented papers.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.