Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save articles in ePub format for your eBook reader…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To save an article in ePub format, look for the ePub reader icon above all articles for logged in users, and click it to quickly save the article, which is automatically downloaded to your computer or device. (There may be times when due to font sizes and other original formatting, the page may overflow onto a second page.).

You can also easily save to PDF format, a journal like printed format.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Montgomery, L. (1939). Psychoanalysis of a Case of Acne Vulgaris. Psychoanal. Rev., 26(2):155-177.

(1939). Psychoanalytic Review, 26(2):155-177

Psychoanalysis of a Case of Acne Vulgaris

Louis Montgomery

Because of the apparent psychological significance of the skin as a means of intercommunication between the inner and the outer worlds, skin diseases obviously deserve the attention of psychoanalysts. Yet, the examination of the literature discloses little systematic application of psychoanalytic technique to skin manifestations. Barinbaum (1) has pointed out the significance of psychoanalysis to dermatology. “In adjudging psychogenic skin diseases,” he says, “psychoanalysis merits first place, because this method alone among all methods of psychotherapy is able to reveal the sources of the energy bound up in these diseases. It is only this knowledge that makes possible a rational therapy. Every psychogenic skin disease is a symptom of a psychoneurosis, specifically a conversion hysteria, providing physical release of repressed impulses.”

Numerous writers since Kreibich and Doswald (2), to whom we owe the first demonstration that skin blisters can be produced hypnotically, have established the existence of psychogenic skin diseases. Dunbar (3) lists 120 communications bearing directly on the subject. Recently Schilder (4) reported quite extensively on the psychology of the skin. However, the literature in general seems barren of detailed psychoanalytic case histories of psychogenic skin diseases. Jelliffe's early paper (1916) stands alone.

Perhaps the primary reason for this may be, as Sack (5) points out, that “without psychic analysis, the diagnosis ‘psychogenic skin disease’ cannot be established. There are no skin manifestations that can be recognized by inspection as psychogenic.”

In the same paper Sack stresses the point, that the skin affords an especially favorable field for the study of psychosomatic relationship, particularly since here all voluntary innervation seems to be excluded.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.