Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Siomopoulos, V. (1969). On Form and Similarity in Mental Functioning. Psychoanal. Rev., 56C(3):415-424.

(1969). Psychoanalytic Review, 56C(3):415-424

On Form and Similarity in Mental Functioning

V. Siomopoulos, M.D.

In the realm of the physical objects the term “form” describes a dimensional arrangement of the matter. In a different frame of reference the term “form” refers to the manner in which the subjective experiences are objectivized through speech, language, art, etc. This paper assumes that the experiences themselves, cognitive as well as affective, are also forms. The interest in the form-the form of thinking especially-is a relatively new trend in psychological and psychiatric research. We will here discuss briefly theories and clinical examples where similarity of cognitive forms is involved in one or another way. We will further advance the hypothesis that similarity of affective forms plays an equally crucial role in normality as well as psychopathology.

I.

An image, however vague and indefinite, is always similar to a perceptual impression. Yet, similarity implies form and formal characteristics. In talking about similar objects we mean similar forms-perceptual or image forms. In talking about similar relationships, functions, contents we are referring again to similar forms: of function, relationship, content. This reduction is seemingly self-contradictory. How can we call form what we have already called content or function-notions antithetical to that of form?

We shall limit the argument to the opposition of form and content. The term “form” generally refers to the question how the phenomena are expressed and experienced.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.