Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To access the PEP-Web Facebook pageā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

PEP-Web has a Facebook page! You can access it by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Robinson, I.E. Clune, F.J., Jr. (1969). Sexual Symbolism and Archeology. Psychoanal. Rev., 56C(3):468-480.

(1969). Psychoanalytic Review, 56C(3):468-480

Sexual Symbolism and Archeology

Ira E. Robinson, Ph.D. and Francis J. Clune, Jr., Ph.D.

That “man is the symbol-bearing creature” is the one axiom which all social scientists agree upon. The implications are clear. Man as an organism has the unique capacity to utilize symbols, and builds his world of symbols. Theorists in all of the social sciences as well as philosophy have devoted vast quantities of energy, paper and apparatus to delve into the symbolic nature of the human organism. Cassirer, Mead, Sullivan, and others have attempted to delineate man and society in terms of his symbols. More recently psychologists and sociologists have produced vast amounts of literature on various aspects of language. The Whorfian hypothesis, so often quoted but so seldom analyzed, tells us that without language we could not think and also that the precise syntax of each language defines what and how we shall think.

Anthropologists of various schools have attempted to develop theories of how language began. While it is not our purpose to attempt such a task, it is clear to the authors that language can only have arisen out of the biological nature of man as an organism, with the world being defined as that which is knowable.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.