Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Siller, J. (1969). Psychopathology. By Arnold H. Buss. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966. 483 pp.. Psychoanal. Rev., 56C(3):485-486.

(1969). Psychoanalytic Review, 56C(3):485-486

Psychopathology. By Arnold H. Buss. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1966. 483 pp.

Review by:
Jerome Siller

Psychologists are increasingly concerned with defining their role independently of the “medical model.” Thus, concepts such as that of disease and illness are condemned, and therapeutic procedures based on social processes or learning principles are progressively favored over those stressing intrapsychic phenomena. A spate of undergraduate textbooks on abnormal psychology recently have been issued, which vigorously proclaim their emancipation from the straitjacket of archaic concepts, i.e., psychoanalytic “mythology.” To many, the psychologist's uniqueness in the area of psychopathology resides in his profession's highly developed research proficiency. Individuals holding such beliefs place a premium on verifiable procedures. Learning theory therefore becomes a springboard for those who are interested in psychopathology but for whom subjectivity and metaphysical conjecture are unacceptable. There is a natural tendency to make dynamic psychology, and psychoanalysis in particular, something of a whipping boy to demonstrate the greater virility of the new look. Psychopathology, presumably intended for advanced undergraduates, avoids naiveté while effectively demonstrating many of the issues and alternate paths that accompany identification with any particular theoretical orientation.

Professor Buss, a frequent contributor to the research literature, has presented a research oriented volume which affords maximum respect to laboratory data. For him, the subjectivity of clinical impressions drastically limits their value in scientific endeavors.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.