Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Goldberg, H. (1971-72). Games Analysts Play. Martin Shepard and Marjorie Lee. New York: Putnam's Sons, 1970. 189. Psychoanal. Rev., 58(4):644-645.

(1971-72). Psychoanalytic Review, 58(4):644-645

Games Analysts Play. Martin Shepard and Marjorie Lee. New York: Putnam's Sons, 1970. 189

Review by:
Helen Goldberg

This book is aimed at uncovering the “inauthentic encounters,” the “unproductive transactions” (games) engaged in by analysts. The authors view much of classical analytic theory and technique as not being helpful to patients and, instead, press for an action-oriented, behavioral approach to therapy. Those whose practice is guided in large measure by Freudian theory and methods are seen as effete individuals, so overwhelmed by their own feelings of inferiority, sexuality and aggressiveness in regards to their patients that they can only substitute games injurious to the patient instead of offering them a real therapeutic relationship.

According to the authors, analysts of this description should be criticized and condemned, but their book is not effective in this respect. Professional readers will have to dismiss it because of misinterpretations of theory and misstatements of fact. The concept of counter-transference is distorted and made to appear as an arbitrary dictum standing in the way of meaningful interchange between patient and analyst as well as a tool used by control analysts against their students. Similarly, the possibility of behavioral change occurring as a result of insight as well as the meaning of “talking out” rather than “acting out” is misunderstood. Perhaps the authors' most serious fault is their dichotomizing of the therapeutic approach—the reader is left with the feeling that either an analyst is a behaviorist and therefore effective or a classical analyst and therefore ineffective.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.