Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by author…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

While performing a search, you can sort the articles by Author in the Search section. This will rearrange the results of your search alphabetically according to the author’s surname. This feature is useful to quickly locate the work of a specific author.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Rawn, M.L. (1974). The Present Utility of Classical Analysis. Psychoanal. Rev., 61(3):457-473.

(1974). Psychoanalytic Review, 61(3):457-473

The Present Utility of Classical Analysis

Moss L. Rawn, Ph.D.

As we all know, very little in psychoanalytic theory, let alone practice, is universally accepted by all analysts. Nearly every subject in our field continues to be shrouded in controversy, conflicting claims, and precious little agreement. Perhaps one of the best examples of this is the issues surrounding classical analysis, its definition and technique. What follows is an attempt to sketch the main lines of several important technical issues in the current practice of psychoanalysis.

A recent summarizing article by Wallerstein, written in 1969, emphasizes our interest in “The Present Utility of Classical Analysis.” Wallerstein's paper is drawn from his introduction to a panel discussion at the Rome Congress of the International Psychoanalytic Association and deals with the relationship of psychoanalysis to psychotherapy. He says the goals, aims, technique, methods, patients, therapeutic activity, treatment values, and relationship to time are all different in the two approaches. Furthermore, he writes that although there have been many attempts to define psychoanalysis, the American Psychoanalytic Association has never been able to arrive at a definition that would satisfy the majority of the membership. Not only that, but he, quoting Rangell, says that what constitutes psychoanalysis, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, and transitional forms likewise have never been described in a manner that would meet majority agreement.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.