Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by sourceā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Source. This will rearrange the results of your search, displaying articles according to their appearance in journals and books. This feature is useful for tracing psychoanalytic concepts in a specific psychoanalytic tradition.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Giovacchini, P.L. (1984). The Psychoanalytic Paradox: The Self as a Transitional Object. Psychoanal. Rev., 71(1):81-104.

(1984). Psychoanalytic Review, 71(1):81-104

The Psychoanalytic Paradox: The Self as a Transitional Object

Peter L. Giovacchini

Introduction

In this article I will discuss a group of patients, in my opinion a fairly sizeable group, who present special difficulties if we attempt to treat them psychoanalytically. These are clinical situations that can be best understood in terms of ego pathology and have been extensively explored under the rubric of borderline states. Kernberg (1975) and Masterson (1976) have outlined general patterns characteristic of borderline patients, whereas Giovacchini (1975, 1979) and Menaker (1979) have emphasized specific character traits as well as general developmental vicissitudes.

Some patients suffering from structural defects can be treated by using standard psychoanalytic technique. What characterological factors hamper or determine treatability is a topic that has not been extensively explored. Understanding the specific developmental constellations that are the foundations of psychopathology will enable the clinician to make connections and distinctions between treatment impasses and the repetition of infantile traumas in the current transference setting.

I will focus upon a specific type of patient suffering from a character defect which I will later distinguish from the typical borderline state. These patients present themselves in a fashion that would seem to preclude analysis. Still there is something about them that is appealing and which indicates that they are capable of using insights. In spite of their concreteness and neediness, they also reveal aspects of their personality that are sensitive, intuitive, and creative, qualities that are considered favorable for analysis.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.